writer is engaged for decades to bring democracy and promote social, economic, industrial. Towards the end of the years '60, the last century, and the following years, through the Research Center that I direct, first in Bologna and Milan, I proposed the "Employee participation in corporate governance", in line with the experiences in Germany. In Milan, I organized "seminars and conferences" on innovative models of industrial relations and alternative models of work organization. It 's really wide press coverage, which stores and which has become the cultural heritage of the Catholic University of Milan, which makes the memory of the cultural line and the proposed project. I like to say that I know the question of social and industrial policies. And therefore, I find it useful to express an opinion on what is happening in Italy, about the "labor policies." About the employment crisis and the actions and decisions of the FIAT. Based on my experience, the CISL and UIL have always preferred to defend the interests of workers using the dynamic contract, namely the "Contract" the contract, the more "guaranteed" as possible against the expectations of workers and at the same time, a willingness to consider "participatory formulas." The CGIL, however, has always favored a "conception of ideology." With the rejection of any attitude "participatory". For decades, cultural and social environments, close to the CGIL, have developed conceptions of "class", the "class conflict" as guidelines. including industrial relations and labor. Today, faced with the challenge of "globalization" becomes, in my view, important to reinvigorate the idea of \u200b\u200b"common action" to safeguard jobs, including the business community, labor, trade unions, and political-institutional. Must in other words, emergence with the contribution of those involved a new "project of the country" and a leading industrial and social policy. Having most of all they care about the needs of new generations of young people, especially young people of the South in this context, we will understand better my opinion on the "question of FIAT. FIAT is part of the history of our country is undoubtedly an industry which contributed to the growth of Italy, bringing it to be, with other businesses, one of the major industrialized countries in the world. But the country, the institutions, have never abandoned the FIAT in times of serious difficulties that have marked her journey. The institutions, with various governments since the war, have always shown great sensitivity towards the Fiat. The media have undoubtedly been significant. Today, Fiat has great leadership, a leadership of international importance. It 'just that this leadership cares more than the interests of the Fiat, it is right to give "projects" of preservation and compatible development. But this "compatibility" leads to rule out what is "compatible" with the expectations of Italian workers, the Italian institutions. It 's really impossible to find the "right BALANCE"? I am convinced that if Fiat were to take the same attitudes of FIOM it would hurt. I am convinced that if Fiat were to be considered "peripheral" Italy, it would hurt. Fiat and Fiat as an expression of 'Italian' in the sense that is guaranteed by an image, an attitude, a total know-how that belongs to the tradition of our country. We must find, then, an intelligent composition of the matter: the government must foster a new quality in terms of industrial policy, creating a "framework of reference for the social partners, the leadership of Fiat should not assume an attitude, like" eat or o. ...", this soup unions are called to acts of responsibility grade. As indeed are already doing the directors of the CISL and UIL .. The FIOM CGIL with the need to clarify whether they accept the "good possible" or asking "everything" at risk of losing workers to Italy and the opportunities for new sources of development and work. 'S time to wise and courageous people.
Franco MANGIALARDI
0 comments:
Post a Comment